Investor View

Sponsorship ROI & Market Opportunity

Data-driven benchmarks and partnership pipeline

Market Opportunity

$87.4B

Global Sports Sponsorship Market (2025)

7.2% CAGR → $162.8B by 2034

Source: Statista / IEG 2025

3:1 – 6:1

Average Sponsorship ROI Benchmark

Brands with measurement see +35% higher ROI

Source: Forrester 2024

42%

F1 Female Fanbase (2025)

Up from 8% in 2017 — 48% of new fans are female

Source: F1 Global Fan Survey 2025

The Measurement Gap

Competitive Moat

76%

of marketers struggle to calculate sponsorship ROI

Source: Forrester 2024

<5%

of sponsorship spend goes to women's sports despite 75% higher ROI

Source: Nielsen Sports 2024

Brands are investing more in sponsorship ($87.4B, growing 7.2%/year) in a category they openly admit they cannot measure. Nodal solves this with pre-deal ROI verification and data-backed partnership scoring.

Partnership Pipeline

Talent / PropertyProspectMatch ScoreAudience OverlapSentiment AlignmentCommercial FitStatus
Bianca BustamanteGlobe Telecom
82
828578Strong Match
Bianca BustamanteRazer
76
727880Moderate Match
F1 AcademyGlobe Telecom
76
758270Moderate Match
Bianca BustamanteLogitech G
74
707678Moderate Match
Bianca BustamanteWhoop
71
687572Moderate Match

Talent & Property Portfolio

NameSeriesFollowersEngagement RatePrimary Platform
Bianca BustamanteEuroCup 31.8M—Instagram, YouTube, TikTok
Hana BurtonGT Racing340K—Instagram, YouTube
Formula EFormula E2.5M—Instagram, YouTube, TikTok, X
F1 AcademyF1 Academy1.8M—Instagram, YouTube, TikTok, X
Bianca BustamanteF1 Academy / GB31.2M—Instagram, YouTube, TikTok, X
Craft Bamboo RacingGT World Challenge Asia450K—Instagram, YouTube, X
Hana BurtonGT Racing340K—Instagram, YouTube
GB3 ChampionshipGB3320K—Instagram, YouTube, X

ROI Projection Model

Title Partner

5.75x ROI

Investment

$2M

Projected EMV

$11.5M

Principal Partner

5.20x ROI

Investment

$750K

Projected EMV

$3.9M

Associate Partner

4.60x ROI

Investment

$250K

Projected EMV

$1.15M

Based on industry benchmarks (IEG, Nielsen Sports) and Craft Bamboo digital CPMs ($2.50–$4.20 vs $18–$32 for linear sports TV)

Validated by Market Leaders

Charlotte TilburySephoraTommy HilfigerPUMAAmExLEGOGucci

All investing in female motorsport (F1 Academy 2024–2025)

Source: F1 Academy official partner announcements

Trial Summary and Questions

Data Source Inventory — Remaining Setup

SourcePriorityTypeUse CaseCostStatus
YouTube Data APIHighVideo APIBothFreePending
Reddit/ApifyHighScrapingBothLowPending
AudienseHighAudience ProfilingBothLowPending
KeyholeHighSocial ListeningCase 1MediumPending
MentionHighSocial ListeningCase 2LowPending
Craft Bamboo Brand DocsHighBrand DocsBothFreePending
YouGov ProfilesMediumAudience ProfilingCase 2MediumPending
GWIHighAudience ProfilingBothHighPending

Nodal AI vs Alternative: Claude Access

Side-by-side comparison of working with Nodal AI vs getting Claude access for your team.

CapabilityNodal AI PlatformClaude (Team/Pro)
Custom sentiment engineBuilt and liveRequires dev team
Partnership ROI scoringBuilt and live (4 profiles)Manual prompts only
Real-time data integration10 sources identifiedNo data integration
Geographic sentiment mapping8 countries trackedNot available
Content theme analysis5 themes, 290 postsManual analysis
Share of voice tracking6 properties trackedNot available
Fan-to-industry affinity9 mappings scoredNot available
Investor view + ROI projectionsFull model builtManual calc
Sponsorship sales collateralReady (market data + ROI)Manual build needed
Dashboard / visual interfaceLive web platformChat interface only
Ongoing data pipelineAutomated feedsOne-off queries
Multi-user accessPlatform-based, scalablePer-seat licence
Monthly cost$400-600 (trial)$20-30/user + dev costs
Setup timeAlready builtWeeks to months

Bottom line: Claude gives you AI access. Nodal gives you a built, tested, and deployed platform with live engines, real data, and sponsorship-ready outputs. Building this internally with Claude would require a developer, data engineer, and weeks of setup, and you would still not have the integrated dashboard, automated data pipelines, or ROI projection model.

Pricing: Market Value vs Trial Rate

What this platform would cost in the market

ComparisonMonthly CostWhat You Get
Brandwatch$800-3,000/moSocial listening, no motorsport focus
Meltwater$1,500-4,000/moMedia monitoring, no ROI scoring
Cision$2,000-5,000/moPR analytics, no partnership matching
Talkwalker$1,000-3,000/moSocial analytics, no sponsorship ROI
Custom build (one-off)$50K-150K+What Nodal has already built
Nodal AI (trial rate)$400-600/moFull platform, both cases, all engines

What Craft Bamboo is getting

  • Custom-built platform with two live AI engines (sentiment analysis + partnership scoring)
  • Six motorsport properties tracked with audience, sentiment, and SOV data
  • Five partnership matches scored with ROI projections
  • Investor view with market data, ROI model, and sponsorship sales collateral
  • Geographic analysis across eight countries
  • Content theme analysis across 290 posts
  • Ten data sources identified with integration roadmap
  • Pre-deal signals: share of voice, fan-to-industry affinity, industry signals

The value gap

The trial rate of $400-600/month represents roughly 10-20% of what comparable platforms charge in the market, and less than 1% of the build cost. The reason is simple: the trial exists to prove the model. Once Craft Bamboo is satisfied with the outputs and ready to scale (more data sources connected, more properties tracked, more prospects scored), we can discuss what that looks like. The trial rate is locked in for the duration of the trial period. For context: the platform has already delivered sponsorship sales collateral that can be used in conversations with Globe Telecom, Razer, Logitech G, and Whoop. A single partnership deal signed off the back of this data would deliver ROI many times over the annual platform cost.

Next Steps

  1. 1.Schedule a walkthrough call to review the platform together
  2. 2.Connect remaining data sources (YouTube API, Keyhole, Reddit/Apify are free or low cost)
  3. 3.Begin importing social engagement and comment data for sentiment analysis
  4. 4.Confirm trial pricing and credits allocation
  5. 5.Identify additional prospects for partnership matching beyond the current five

Open Questions for Craft Bamboo

  • Which platforms are primary for each talent (Bianca vs Hana) — should we prioritise Instagram and YouTube given current data availability?
  • Can we get platform analytics exports (Instagram Insights, YouTube Studio, TikTok Analytics) for Bianca and Hana?
  • Are there internal brand documents or positioning notes we can incorporate for either talent?
  • For Case 2 — what is the prospect goal profile (commercial objectives, target audience, KPIs) for the partnership being modelled?
  • Can we get deal notes or briefing documents for the prospect(s) under consideration?
  • Should we expand the motorsport property comparison list beyond the current six properties?
  • Which partner industry vertical should we model the comparison against for Case 2?

Data sourced from Forrester, Nielsen Sports, F1 Global Fan Survey, Liberty Media financials, IEG, Statista

Last updated: August 2026